In the table
The tools in the video table.
SeemerceFusing generative AI, multi-agent frameworks, and high-throughput data processing to automate business workflows.
For narrative-driven workloads, Seedance 2.5 leads today: it delivers up to 30 seconds of video in a single generation pass and accepts up to 50 reference files. Its resolution ceiling, however, is 720p, so where output must ship directly to a client, Kling VIDEO 3.0 and its native 4K capacity is the better call in the decision architecture.
Last checked: This is a reference page. It is re-checked against the vendor sources and updated when a new version ships. Change log
The ring below is the same set of weights printed in the table headers further down.
We chose these weights, and that is the only judgment call in the table. Weight them differently and the order changes.
Every figure in this table is extracted from that vendor own technical documentation. An empty cell means the vendor has published no figure, not that the value is zero.
| Rank | Tool | Score | Clip length per generation pass 30 | Resolution ceiling 25 | Reference-input capacity 20 | Scene control 15 | Access from Iran 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seedance 2.5 Current pick | 65.0 | 30 seconds Source: www.volcengine.com | 720 lines of vertical resolution Source: www.volcengine.com | 50 reference inputs Source: www.volcengine.com | 4/4 | not verified |
| 2 | Kling VIDEO 3.0 | 46.2 | 15 seconds Source: kling.ai | 2,160 lines of vertical resolution Source: kling.ai | 7 reference inputs Source: kling.ai | 3/4 | not checked / no working route |
| 3 | Veo 3.1 | 40.0 | 8 seconds Source: ai.google.dev | 2,160 lines of vertical resolution Source: ai.google.dev | 3 reference inputs Source: ai.google.dev | 2/4 | blocked / no working route |
| 4 | Runway Gen-4.5 | 2.7 | 10 seconds Source: docs.dev.runwayml.com | 720 lines of vertical resolution Source: docs.dev.runwayml.com | not verified | 1/4 | not checked / no working route |
An empty cell means we could not verify that number, not that the tool scored zero.
Every judged score in this table carries a written reason, and the Iran column says how it was checked. Those two are open here. The measurement trail behind each number, which row of which leaderboard and on how many votes, opens under the model it belongs to.
1 Seedance 2.5
Scene control 4/4 Capacity for up to fifty reference inputs across three data types, plus editing an existing video and extending it twice: scene control and post-generation editing in a single unit
2 Kling VIDEO 3.0
Scene control 3/4 Control capabilities include multi-shot storyboarding, character locking, and binding a voice to each character; post-generation editing is built only into the Omni configuration, which caps at 1080p, not the 4K path
Access from Iran not checked / no working route Kling publishes no supported-countries list, so no claim about network reachability is recorded, and no test has been run from inside Iran. What has been documented is the vendor own user policy: the user must warrant they are not subject to any sanctions or trade embargo. Subscription payment is possible exclusively via international card.
3 Veo 3.1
Scene control 2/4 Capacity for up to three reference images, first and last frame, and extending a previously generated video, but no separate camera control and no regional editing on the finished output
Access from Iran blocked / no working route Google supported-countries list was checked and read directly today: the entry after Indonesia jumps straight to Iraq, and Iran is not recorded on this list. This finding comes from reading a document, not from a network measurement; a direct test from inside Iran has not yet been run.
4 Runway Gen-4.5
Scene control 1/4 The API schema defines only a prompt text and one first-frame image as input; it carries no reference array, no audio parameter, and no capability to edit a finished video
Access from Iran not checked / no working route Runway publishes no country list, but its terms of use specify that its products and services are subject to United States export control law and may not be exported or re-exported without prior US government authorisation. This specification was drawn from the vendor own documentation rather than a network measurement.
Every criterion below has a weight and a source. Change a weight and the whole table recomputes. There is no hand-placed position anywhere in this hub.
| Criterion | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Clip length per generation pass | 30 | vendor stated specificationThe longest clip the component delivers in a single generation pass. Single-pass length is the parameter that removes the edit step, and with it the risk of a face shifting identity between shots |
| Resolution ceiling | 25 | vendor stated specificationThe ceiling in vertical resolution lines, taken directly from vendor technical documentation. 4K here means generating natively at that size, not upscaling after generation |
| Reference-input capacity | 20 | vendor stated specificationHow many reference files one generation pass accepts. For a fixed character or product this figure carries more operational weight than resolution |
| Scene control | 15 | defined scale, with a written reason per assignmentThe only ordinal criterion in this rubric: a range from raw prompting to full scene control plus post-generation editing. Every score assignment is documented with a reason |
| Access from Iran | 10 | our access column, with its method statedTwo components carry data in this column and two do not. An empty cell means no document has been read, and no estimate substitutes for it |
This component takes two columns of the rubric outright. Length: 30 seconds in a single generation pass, against fifteen seconds for Kling and eight for Veo. Reference capacity: 50 input files — 30 images, 10 videos, 10 audio clips — against seven and three for its competitors. For any workload that requires holding a character consistent across a narrative, these two figures outweigh every other parameter.
The same component loses the resolution column entirely. ByteDance own API technical documentation permits only two values, 480p and 720p, for Seedance 2.5, while listing four values up to 4k for Seedance 2.0. In that single parameter, the newer version has regressed against its own predecessor. The same regression shows up again in Runway API schema, which resells this model.
Any workload where the final output ships directly to a client. Kling VIDEO 3.0 is the only component in this rubric that delivers native 4K, and native is the parameter that matters: post-generation upscaling shifts facial position, and character consistency breaks down between shots. Its fifteen seconds are sufficient for an advertising shot. One constraint is documented by the vendor itself and carried here as well: its reference-driven mode (Omni) caps at 1080p, so native 4K and heavy reference input cannot be combined in a single generation pass.
Persian. Kling own technical guide lists five spoken languages: Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean and Spanish. Persian is not on that list, and none of the other three components registers Persian in its spoken-language list either. So for any workload requiring Persian output, regardless of which component is selected, voice production is a separate stage in the pipeline. If you have read somewhere that one of these speaks Persian, ask for the source.
First, generation time. The owner of this reference had requested that generation speed carry an independent weight, and that request is operationally sound, since in real workloads wait time converts directly into cost. But not one of these four vendors has published a generation-time figure. A figure that has not been published is not sourced from an unofficial source, so this column was never built; its place in the data model stays empty until a vendor publishes that figure.
Second, price. Runway API price list is the only source that prices several components in one currency and one unit: one credit equals one cent, Gen-4.5 costs twelve credits per second, Seedance 2.5 at 720p costs thirty credits per second, and Veo 3.1 with audio costs forty credits per second — twelve, thirty and forty cents per second of output, respectively. Kling is not on that list, and its pricing is credit-based and tied to a subscription tier. A column that leaves a quarter of the table empty and fills the rest with a reseller price is more misleading than useful.
Because no document from OpenAI has been read. All three domains — openai.com, sora.com and sora.chatgpt.com — return a 403 status to our server, both through our own fetch tooling and through plain curl. Even the current version name of Sora is unconfirmed, and a version name that has not been observed is not entered into this reference. No empty row was created for it either, because this rubric ranks versions, and no version name is available to us. The day these domains open up, the corresponding row will be added.
Higgsfield was reviewed, and what it offers turned out not to be its own model: it serves Seedance 2.5 and other vendors models on its own platform, exactly as Runway does. So it has no place in a rubric that measures models. Hailuo, Grok Imagine and Luma have not yet been evaluated; their absence from this table means the assessment has not been scheduled, not that they have been disqualified.
For narrative work and character consistency, Seedance 2.5. For professional delivery quality, Kling. For integration into software you are building, Veo 3.1. And if cost is the only binding constraint, Gen-4.5. If the output has to be in Persian, provision a separate voice-production stage in the pipeline from the start of the project: that is the one parameter none of these four components solves for you.
For narrative work and character consistency, Seedance 2.5, with 30 seconds per generation pass and 50 reference inputs. For output at delivery quality, Kling VIDEO 3.0, the only component in this rubric with native 4K.
Seedance 2.5, at 30 seconds per generation pass. Kling delivers fifteen, Gen-4.5 ten, and Veo 3.1 eight. Veo can extend further, but the extended output is generated only at 720p.
None of these four. Kling, the only one that publishes its spoken-language list, names five languages and Persian is not among them. For Persian output, provision voice production as a separate pipeline stage.
Veo has no official route; Iran is not on Google list of supported countries. For Kling and Seedance, no document has been read, and no estimate is offered in its place. We do not sell accounts and do not recommend circumvention methods.
If the final output has to be a publish-ready video rather than a raw clip, that is exactly the work handled in
our motion graphics serviceFor narrative work Seedance 2.5 leads: up to 30 seconds in one pass and up to 50 reference files. But its resolution tops out at 720p; if you deliver straight to a client, Kling VIDEO 3.0 at 4K is the better pick.
Tap any step to read the details behind it.
Every weight is visible on the page. Change one and the table recalculates, and there is no field for a hand-set position. The weights are our only judgment call.
Each number comes from the maker or from the benchmark's own leaderboard. Unverified stays unverified.
An empty cell means we could not verify that number, not that the tool scored zero.
With the date checked and how it was extracted.
The ranking method is open on the page, and you can see every weight.
Tap any solution to see exactly what it includes.
In one pass.
Vertical lines.
How many reference files.
A judged score.
Honestly.
Seedance 2.5.
We set Arena and Artificial Analysis beside Seemerce's video table.
Artificial Analysis benchmarks models across several modalities including video.
With us Seedance 2.5 delivers up to 30 seconds of video in one pass.
Arena ranks models across categories such as Agent, Text, WebDev and Vision.
With us Seedance 2.5 tops out at 720 lines; Kling VIDEO 3.0 and Veo 3.1 reach 2,160.
Artificial Analysis writes of standardised units for fair comparison.
With us Seedance 2.5 accepts up to 50 reference inputs; Kling 7 and Veo 3.
These references do not score scene control separately.
With us Every judged score carries a written reason and opens under its model.
These references have no access-from-Iran column.
With us Kling publishes no supported-countries list, so we record no claim; no test has been run from inside Iran.
Artificial Analysis measures experienced performance, not the maker's claim.
With us Every figure is taken from the maker's own technical documentation; an empty cell means the vendor published no figure.
Sources: Arena (arena.ai); Artificial Analysis; NIST AI RMF
Each figure is from its own source.
The tools in the video table.
SeemerceClip length in one pass.
SeemerceThe resolution ceiling of Kling VIDEO 3.0 and Veo 3.1.
SeemerceSeedance 2.5's resolution ceiling.
SeemerceThe most reference inputs.
SeemerceThe last-checked date.
SeemerceSources: Arena (arena.ai); Artificial Analysis; NIST AI RMF
Only what each platform's page says outright is marked; a blank means the page does not say.
| Practice | Arena | Artificial Analysis | Seemerce |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranking from human votes1 of 2 | Arena's leaderboard rank goes into the calculation | ||
| Price per token1 of 2 | A score-per-dollar measure | ||
| Speed and latency1 of 2 | Not measured on this page | ||
| Weights are visible and changeable0 of 2 | Every weight is on the page; change one and the table recomputes | ||
| An access-from-Iran column0 of 2 | With the date it was checked |
stated on their published page not stated there (it may still be done)
Sources: Arena (arena.ai); Artificial Analysis; NIST AI RMF
The weight of each criterion in this table's score, out of 100.
Sources: the Seemerce video table
Only what this page already promises.
This site only needs essential cookies to work. With your permission, we also use Google Analytics to learn which pages are most useful. It is your choice, and you can change it at any time. Cookie Policy